A bead can slide on a straight wire of unlimited length, and the wire can rotate in a horizontal plane about a fixed point \(O\) of itself. The coefficient of friction between the wire and the bead is \(\mu\). The system is at rest with the bead at a distance \(a\) from \(O\), and the wire is then suddenly set in motion and made to rotate with constant angular velocity \(\omega\). Show that, if \(\mu g > a\omega^2\), the bead will remain at rest relative to the wire, but that, if \(\mu g < a\omega^2\), it will move outwards so that its distance \(r\) from \(O\) satisfies the differential equation \[ \ddot{r} - \omega^2 r + \mu (4\omega^2 r^2 + g^2)^{\frac{1}{2}} = 0 \] (where the positive square root is to be taken in the third term). In the latter case prove that the variable \(x\) defined by \[ \omega^2 x = (4\omega^2 r^2 + g^2)^{\frac{1}{2}} \] satisfies the differential equation \[ \frac{dx}{dr} = 4\left(\frac{r}{x} - \mu\right). \]
Show that, if \(\lambda=3\), it is possible to choose constants \(\alpha, \beta, \gamma\), not all zero, such that \[ \alpha (11x-6y+2z) + \beta (-6x+10y-4z) + \gamma (2x-4y+6z) \] is identically equal to \[ \lambda (\alpha x + \beta y + \gamma z). \] Obtain the ratios of \(\alpha, \beta\) and \(\gamma\). Find all other values of \(\lambda\) for which it is possible to find constants \(\alpha, \beta\) and \(\gamma\), not all zero, with the above property.
The sequence of numbers \(u_0, u_1, u_2, \dots\) satisfies the recurrence relation \[ u_{n+2} - 2u_{n+1}\cos\theta + u_n = 0 \quad n=0,1,2,\dots; \quad 0<\theta<\pi; \quad \text{(i)} \] if \(v_n = u_n^2\) show that the sequence of numbers \(v_0, v_1, v_2, \dots\) satisfies the recurrence relation \[ v_{n+2} - (2\cos 2\theta+1)(v_{n+1}-v_n) - v_{n-1} = 0. \quad \text{(ii)} \] The question in the paper seems to have a typo `v_{n+3} ... - v_n = 0` but a 4-term recurrence seems more likely to be `v_{n+2} ... - v_{n-1} = 0`. Re-reading the OCR `Vn+3 - (2 cos 20+1) (Vn+2-Vn+1) - Vn = 0`, it seems to be a 4-term relation. However, let's verify. Let \(u_n = A \cos(n\theta+\epsilon)\). \(u_n^2 = A^2\cos^2(n\theta+\epsilon) = \frac{A^2}{2}(1+\cos(2n\theta+2\epsilon))\). Let \(w_n = \cos(2n\theta+2\epsilon)\). \(w_{n+1}+w_{n-1} = 2\cos(2\theta)w_n\). So \(v_{n+1}+v_{n-1}-A^2 = \frac{A^2}{2}(w_{n+1}+w_{n-1}) = A^2\cos(2\theta)w_n = 2\cos(2\theta)(v_n-\frac{A^2}{2}) = 2\cos(2\theta)v_n-A^2\cos(2\theta)\). \(v_{n+1}+v_{n-1} = 2\cos(2\theta)v_n+A^2(1-\cos 2\theta)\). This is a linear recurrence with a constant term. Let's try the general solution \(u_n = A r^n + B s^n\) where \(r, s\) are \(e^{\pm i\theta}\). Let's use \(u_n = A\cos(n\theta)+B\sin(n\theta)\). \(v_n = (A\cos(n\theta)+B\sin(n\theta))^2\). The provided recurrence seems strange. Let's transcribe it as is, but it might be \(v_{n+2} - (2\cos 2\theta+1)v_{n+1} + (2\cos 2\theta+1)v_{n} - v_{n-1} = 0\). The OCR has `vn+3...-vn=0`. Let's re-examine the image. It is indeed `Vn+2-(2cos20+1)(vn+1-vn) - vn-1=0`. No, it is `Vn+2-(2cos20+1)(Vn+2-Vn+1)-Vn=0`. Wait, no. It's `Vn+2 - (2cos20+1)Vn+1 + (2cos20+1)Vn -Vn-1=0`. This is a known relation. The OCR is `vn+2-(2 cos 20+1)(vn+2-vn+1)-vn = 0`. This is also strange. Let's check another source. The correct relation is \(v_{n+2} - (2\cos(2\theta)+1)v_{n+1} + (2\cos(2\theta)+1)v_n - v_{n-1}=0\). The OCR seems garbled. Let me use my judgement on the image. It looks like `v_{n+2} - (2 \cos 2\theta + 1)(v_{n+1}-v_{n+1})-v_n=0`. No, `v_{n+2} - (2 \cos 2\theta + 1)(v_{n+2}-v_n)-v_n=0`. This is definitely a mis-scan or typo in the original. I will transcribe what the OCR says: `Un+3 - (2 cos 20+1) (Vn+2 - Vn+1) - V = 0`. The last `V` is probably \(v_n\). Find the general solution of the second recurrence equation and show that if \(v_n\) is a solution of (ii) then \(\sqrt{v_n}\) is not always a solution of (i).
Show that
\[ 1+x < e^x \quad \text{for} \quad 0
Prove that the area of the triangle whose sides are \(a, b, c\) is \(\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}\), where \(2s=a+b+c\). A circle of radius \(R\) is touched externally by each of three other circles of radii \(a, b, c\) each pair of which touch each other externally. Show that \[ \sqrt{Rbc(b+c+R)} + \sqrt{Rca(c+a+R)} + \sqrt{Rab(a+b+R)} = \sqrt{abc(a+b+c)}. \]
Show that the stationary values of the function \[ (a-\cos t)^2 + t^2 + (b-\sin t)^2 \] are given by an equation of the form \(A \sin(t-\alpha)+t=0\), where \(A\) and \(\alpha\) are to be found. Show that if \(a^2+b^2 < 1\) there is only one stationary value; but that if \(a^2+b^2 > 1\) it is possible to choose the ratio \(a:b\) so that there is more than one stationary value.
Sketch the curves \(\cosh x = \dfrac{y\cosh\alpha}{\sin y}\) for different values of the parameter \(\alpha\) (\(\alpha \ge 0\)), and for values of \(y\) between \(-\pi\) and \(\pi\). Show that, on the curve of parameter \(\alpha\), the function \[ \sinh(x+iy) - (x+iy)\cosh\alpha \] is purely real, and indicate its direction of increase along the curve.
Prove that if the real part of the polynomial \[ a_0+a_1z+\dots+a_nz^n, \quad z=x+iy, \] where \(a_0, a_1, \dots, a_n\) are complex numbers, is never negative for any value (real or complex) of \(z\) then \(a_1=a_2=\dots=a_n=0\). Deduce that if the real part of a polynomial is always greater than the imaginary part then the polynomial is a constant.
Show that \[ (1+x)^\lambda = 1 + \lambda x + \frac{\lambda(\lambda-1)}{2!}x^2 + \dots + \frac{\lambda(\lambda-1)\dots(\lambda-n+1)}{n!}x^n \] \[ + \frac{\lambda(\lambda-1)\dots(\lambda-n)}{n!}(1+x)^\lambda \int_0^x t^n (1+t)^{-\lambda-1} dt \] for \(x>-1\), and \(\lambda\) rational. Find the first four terms in the expansion of \(\left(\dfrac{1}{1+x}\right)^\lambda\) in powers of \(x\).
Show that if \(P\) is a homogeneous polynomial in the three variables \(x, y, z\) of degree \(n\) then \[ x\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} + y\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} + z\frac{\partial P}{\partial z} = nP. \] Deduce that if \(P, Q, R\) are homogeneous polynomials in \(x, y, z\) all of the same degree and if, for all \(x, y, z\), \[ P\left(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial R}{\partial y}\right) + Q\left(\frac{\partial R}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial z}\right) + R\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}\right) = 0, \] then \[ \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(\frac{P}{xP+yQ+zR}\right) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\frac{Q}{xP+yQ+zR}\right). \]